This tops the cake
President Bush made a stop in West Allis, Wisconsin today, and when speaking at a rally, he informed the crowd that he'd just heard that former President Clinton was in the hospital for heart surgery. He said that Clinton was in their thoughts and prayers, and according to an AP story on the event, "Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wis., booed. Bush did nothing to stop them."
Okay, I'm not Clinton fan, but that's a pretty cold-hearted, callous reaction.
There just one thing...
It didn't happen.
The audience didn't boo. Bush didn't fail to stop them from doing so.
In fact, their audible reaction was one of surprise and dismay.
Don't believe me? You can hear a soundbite of Bush's words and the crowd's reaction here.
So, how are we to interpret the quote I offered above? Is there any explanation, other than that it was a bald-faced lie? How could the reporter who penned the report possibly explain the reaction in that manner in good faith?
This is unbelievable.
For all of you who don't think there is a liberal bias in the media, here's your example.
You know what makes this all the more interesting? The AP corrected the story and removed the quote above. Later, they offered another version of the story, telling us that "the crowd reacted with applause and with some "ooohs," apparently surprised by the news that Clinton was ill."
You don't say?
Yet the AP failed to give an account for the first version and its lie, let alone apologize.
There needs to be an accounting for this. Someone's butt has to be fired. (Any liberals who read this... don't bother trying to compare this to Bush's WMD "lies". We both know that there is a difference between a mistake and a lie, so don't even think about it.)
For more on this, go here, here, and/or here.